Obviously Levison is attempting to argue that the pen/trap statute is limited to specific information ("metatdata") and it does not allow interception of "all o

Obviously Levison is attempting to argue that the pen/trap statute is limited to specific information ("metatdata") and it does not allow interception of "all of the secure communications [and] administrative traffic". That he didn't cite the chapter and verse which this contradicts seems like an situation where he needed a real defense lawyer.