4 ms·
It sounds like the catch is that you grant them "a royalty-free, transferable, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide license to use, reproduce, modif
by 8_hours_ago 13y ago
It sounds like the catch is that you grant them "a royalty-free, transferable, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide license to use, reproduce, modify, publish, list information regarding, edit, translate, distribute, syndicate, publicly perform, publicly display, and make derivative works of all such User Content"[0].
Perhaps this is the start of a massive stock photo/video company?
[0] https://www.streem.com/terms https://www.streem.com/terms
Edit:
Or even if it's not the start of such a company, it would look awfully tempting for a company in that space to acquire. Having thousands of terabytes of media data, and the rights to modify and distribute it, can be very valuable.
- ritikm 13y agoDefinitely not our goal; happy to explain further: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7601652 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7601652. Or take a look at the CEO of Reddit's post on this: http://www.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/1sndxe/weve_rewritten_our_user_agreement_come_check_it/cdzaf2a http://www.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/1sndxe/weve_rewritten_...
- dazig 13y agoYeah, really scary. But just trust them, they are a corporation. Corporations always have the customer's best interest at heart. They aren't about making as much profit as possible...oh wait, yes they are.