4 ms·
Yeah, it's complicated. On the one hand, you have dodging and burning, which were often used in actual darkrooms and are still used by respected photojournalis
by wooster 12y ago
Yeah, it's complicated.
On the one hand, you have dodging and burning, which were often used in actual darkrooms and are still used by respected photojournalists to increase the impact of their photos. [0]
Then you have things like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnan_Hajj_photographs_controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnan_Hajj_photographs_controve...
Where clumsy and obvious use of the clone tool damaged the reputation of an entire news organization.
The AP standards and practices strikes an interesting balance [1]:
AP pictures must always tell the truth. We do not alter or digitally
manipulate the content of a photograph in any way.
The content of a photograph must not be altered in Photoshop or by
any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted
from any photograph. The faces or identities of individuals must not
be obscured by Photoshop or any other editing tool. Only retouching
or the use of the cloning tool to eliminate dust on camera sensors
and scratches on scanned negatives or scanned prints are acceptable.
Minor adjustments in Photoshop are acceptable. These include cropping,
dodging and burning, conversion into grayscale, and normal toning and
color adjustments that should be limited to those minimally necessary
for clear and accurate reproduction (analogous to the burning and
dodging previously used in darkroom processing of images) and that
restore the authentic nature of the photograph. Changes in density,
contrast, color and saturation levels that substantially alter the
original scene are not acceptable. Backgrounds should not be digitally
blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning. The
removal of “red eye” from photographs is not permissible.
[0] http://www.poynter.org/uncategorized/14840/a-photojournalistic-confession/ http://www.poynter.org/uncategorized/14840/a-photojournalist...
[1] http://www.ap.org/company/news-values http://www.ap.org/company/news-values
- cfqycwz 12y agoI'm curious to know why the AP don't allow red-eye removal--if the only manipulations allowed are those that help restore the clarity and accuracy to reality of the photographs, I'm not quite sure why red-eye removal wouldn't be permitted--most people's eyes, after all, are not red.
- lnanek2 12y agoSure they are red - in the brief instant the flash lights them up. You can see it with a spotlight too, try following someone around a dark stage with a spotlight.