5 ms·
I think it's a decent metric, and I'm surprised you don't agree. If we forget the "human time" part, it's a clear indicator of which method is more efficient.
by scott_s 13y ago
I think it's a decent metric, and I'm surprised you don't agree. If we forget the "human time" part, it's a clear indicator of which method is more efficient.
- dfc 13y agoGiven that you want to "forget the 'human time' part" I am curious what you think the metric is for. Maybe you meant to respond to a different comment. In this thread I had asked if anyone had any numbers/estimates for processing time. I wanted these numbers because "It would be interesting to see how many minutes of human time are needed for the average paper return."
- scott_s 13y agoI had assumed "minutes of human time" was a proxy-metric for efficiency.