Trivial arithmetic: 192 ÷ 48 = 4 24 ÷ 16 = 1.5 4 × 1.5 = 6 The six times is also on the wrong side of your equation, I guess. But if you

Trivial arithmetic: 192 ÷ 48 = 4 24 ÷ 16 = 1.5 4 × 1.5 = 6 The six times is also on the wrong side of your equation, I guess. But if you need a source, I can cite what you cited: > Unfortunately, there is no point to distributing music in 24-bit/192kHz format. Its playback fidelity is slightly inferior to 16/44.1 or 16/48, and it takes up 6 times the space. They were talking about both sampling rate and bit depth. Oh, and just for the record, I do agree with the general idea that it's useless to ship audio to consumers as 192/24, for the same reason it's unwieldy to publish photos online as 20+ MiB raw files (even if browsers could display them). I was just noting that the size comparison included both sampling rate and bit depth and not just one of them.