3 ms·

Well the article appeared to contain a lot better information than your post. If you want to share your knowledge then do it. Don't just say something is stupid

• throwaway5752 13y ago
  Piss off. If you know better, you can dispute my assertion on a factual basis instead of objecting on optics. There's an enormous amount of written material on the internet that's well indexed by Google, freely available to you if you care to look it up. edit: Also, if you'd managed to ask in a less snide way or even asked something specific, I'd have given a substantive response.
  • gph 13y ago
    Piss off? How nice of you. Anyway, you did drop a bunch of claims with nothing backing them up in your first post. Am I supposed to google myself a comprehensive knowledge of our energy crisis to argue against some random person on the internet just because they say they have knowledge about it? You basically retorted a fairly well developed article with "I'm an expert and this is stupid. There's a good possibility a lot of us will die in the next 50 years because our use of fossil fuels is way higher than our supply. I'm not going to actually list any of my expert knowledge though..." I see in a post above you gave a good response, so thanks for that. But I don't see why you feel my response was unwarranted. Just because you say you know a bit about a subject doesn't mean people on the internet have to take your word for it. Perhaps you read my comment a bit harsher than I wanted, but that is a hefty article and an even heftier subject matter to brush off with the half a paragraph you originally typed.