4 ms·
I understand why some (especially here) might think manual labor is useless, but those more hardware-oriented people might understand the value. Even if you've
by ignostic 12y ago
I understand why some (especially here) might think manual labor is useless, but those more hardware-oriented people might understand the value. Even if you've worked on a lawn mower or jimmy rigged a gadget you might understand the potential gains.
When you tinker with something you see why it works, how it might work better, etc. Sometimes a software architect needs to dig into the code. Sometimes a mechanical engineer just needs to work with the parts. This has the added benefit of putting the mind in a relaxed state where creativity tends to occur. I know there are studies along these lines, too, but I'm not great at tracking down or validating nuero/psych studies.
I have no idea if the benefits I mentioned the intended result, but I think it's interesting. It may or may not be more beneficial to have people repair broken things, solve mechanical problems, or create non-standard parts from scratch to see what happens.
- colechristensen 12y agoThere are jobs suited to humans and jobs suited to machines. Most things which are automated by machines ought to be done by humans some of the time for the exact reasons you specify: people will be more clever than machines in some ways for a very long time. --- It relates tangentially to my struggles with Ubuntu and modern automated configuration tools .. that is, one gets the general feeling that a whole lot of it is designed and implemented by folks who didn't ever really master doing it by hand making the increasing layers of abstraction more and more shaky. ...or maybe I'm just old and grumpy.