> You seem to be of the opinion that exercising free speech cannot be an attack, which I call bullshit on Quite the opposite, actually. It's just that I have

> You seem to be of the opinion that exercising free speech cannot be an attack, which I call bullshit on Quite the opposite, actually. It's just that I have trouble caring about the negative repercussions from OkCupid saying "please visit our site using some other product" vs the negative repercussions for thousands of Californians, among them many mozillans, of Brandon Eich saying "here is $1000 to help make sure these people stay second-class citizens. Here's $1000 to make sure Alice's long-term partner can be denied access to her in the hospital. Here's $1000 to actively hurt other human beings". At the end of the day, OkCupid wasn't out to deny Eich fundamental human rights. It's like complaining about the brightness of a candle held next to the noon-day sun