4 ms·
>>He worked on a personal project during company time. Doesn't he claim this is not true? "I did not do so on company time (as proven by the git commit logs),
by voidlogic 12y ago
>>He worked on a personal project during company time.
Doesn't he claim this is not true?
"I did not do so on company time (as proven by the git commit logs), I worked on it in the evenings after I had completed my work for the day."
- Hovertruck 12y agoTo be fair, you can work on something and wait until the evening to commit it.
- Gigablah 12y agoYou can also modify the commit timestamps. ... which means that there is no way to prove that you worked on something in your personal time, I guess?
- johnfactorial 12y agoTime isn't the only corporate asset he could have utilized to create his competing code. He might have utilized corporate-funded computers, LAN hardware, Internet access/bandwidth, etc. When I worked for a major Internet corporation I signed a contract specifically stating that anything I created using any corporate resources belonged to the company. Thus, when I worked on open source stuff, I did it from home using my own computer on my own time. Did the author sign such a contract, or violate such a contract by using company assets other than business hours? We just don't know.
- kzahel 12y agoMaybe he was breathing some residual company oxygen while he was in his home working on this software. It would follow that he used company resources and thus the software he created must belong entirely to his former employer.
- johnfactorial 12y agoNon sequitur means "it does not follow."