4 ms·
This was pain to use. Far from automated, crashed all the time, horrible UI and UX (pretty common in OSS). I'm sure the results might have been better compared
by rplnt 13y ago
This was pain to use. Far from automated, crashed all the time, horrible UI and UX (pretty common in OSS). I'm sure the results might have been better compared to regular "click next" panoramic software.. but it was simply not worth it for my (personal) use-case.
Then I used some proprietary program for windows (arcsoft maybe? not sure now), which a had limited free version, and it was a breeze to use. Selecting images was intuitive, reordering was easy, configuration was simple and stitching was automatic.
- keithpeter 13y agoI'm not seeing Hugin crash. Debian Wheezy, stitching around 20 jpegs snapped from phone, using the default auto options. When was this?
- rplnt 13y agoMaybe three years ago? On Fedora I think.
- keithpeter 13y agoI was using Hugin on Ubuntu Lucid so about then. Can't remember any big issues but doing full sized stitches as TIFFs did use a lot of memory and take some time (swapping).