3 ms·
Because they are more often used for scripting then anything else. Let's not add political correctness to programming.
by CmonDev 13y ago
Because they are more often used for scripting then anything else. Let's not add political correctness to programming.
- illumen 13y ago"Because they are more often used for scripting then anything else. Let's not add political correctness to programming." Citation? You're just making stuff up.
- CmonDev 13y agopython.org Look at main page: "Python is a programming language that lets you work quickly and integrate systems more effectively." - it's about integration (where dynamic scripting can shine). Look into history: https://docs.python.org/2/faq/general.html#id6 https://docs.python.org/2/faq/general.html#id6 "It occurred to me that a scripting language with a syntax like ABC but with access to the Amoeba system calls would fill the need." - it was created as a scripting language. Look into FAQ about compilation: https://docs.python.org/2/faq/design.html#can-python-be-compiled-to-machine-code-c-or-some-other-language https://docs.python.org/2/faq/design.html#can-python-be-comp... "Can Python be compiled ...? Not easily. ... a “compiled” Python program would probably consist mostly of calls into the Python run-time system, even for seemingly simple operations like x+1. ... ... improves the start-up time of Python scripts. ... Note that the main script executed by Python ... Usually main scripts are quite short, so this doesn’t cost much speed." - no comments. Of course now it's increasingly being marketed as a general purpose programming language because it makes devs feel better.
- illumen 13y agoMarketing is not evidence. Stop making stuff up. Mods: Please delete my account. I'm done.
- rubiquity 13y agoRight, because people aren't building real systems with Python and Ruby. We're just building toy systems, duh! Scripting language is a pejorative.
- fat0wl 13y agoheh but isn't it also the reverse as well? it's an insult laid at Java insinuating that it is not nearly as lean/simple/modern. That's the feeling these flamewar phrasings leave me with anyway. I left Ruby for the JVM and I'll never look back despite all these articles implying Java is not "modern" because it lacks all the features that make scripting language devs "so much faster". Rock-solid, efficient, type-checked code on an efficient platform should be considered modern as well :D that said, i love Clojure so it's not like i'm a hater -- i just like Java interoperability & don't see the coding paradigms as mutually exclusive. Can't we all just git along?