3 ms·
If the Heartbleed bug was still viable against your service, I'd say that he made the wrong call and should've emailed your team about it. But here, we're basi
by daeken 13y ago
If the Heartbleed bug was still viable against your service, I'd say that he made the wrong call and should've emailed your team about it. But here, we're basically talking forensics.
I've written at length about the decision to not roll the keys as soon as Heartbleed was discovered, so I won't repeat myself, but in short: him publicizing this, as well as the Cloudflare challenge immediately getting slapped down, should make it clear to everyone that if you have a memory read, you should assume everything is compromised.
Hopefully this is a good thing for security in general.
- brians 13y agoThere I agree with you. Thanks.
- daeken 13y agoFor what it's worth, I think that the patch you guys threw out there (and have been using for a while) is a great idea, and I really hope it ends up in mainline OpenSSL. I think you guys have acted 100% properly from a tech perspective in this whole thing, even if a bug did pop up (when do they not?). I disagree strongly with the business decision made w.r.t. keys, but I hope people don't take that as me ragging on the tech team over there; you guys are doing good work.
- anonymouse01 13y agoHow do you know the business team didn't ask the tech team: "Should we rotate all the keys?" And someone said: "Nope, we wrote this awesome custom allocator in 2001, all good!". FWIW, we're still waiting for our cert to be reissued by Akamai. It's only been 6 days since everyone else reissued their certs. Great job team!