3 ms·

uh if it's GPL, don't you have to release it?

• pilif 13y ago
  Nope. As long as they don't distribute it but only run it in a server, they don't have to. This is what the AGPL is changing.
  • brians 13y ago
    Not here: you can't do much with AGPL+OpenSSL. AGPL requires release under AGPL. OpenSSL requires advertising clause. There is no legal way to distribute software including parts you have only under APGL and parts you have only under OpenSSL license.
    • yukichan 13y ago
      > There is no legal way to distribute software including parts you have only under APGL and parts you have only under OpenSSL license. If you modified AGPL code you have to release it. If you've mixed up GPL or AGPL code such that you can't release it you've violated the license for the hard work of others. You sound confused, to phrase it charitably.
      • vidarh 13y ago
        My interpretation of what he wrote is that it does not change things for them in the sense that due to conflicting licenses, they can't use AGPL'd software, and so the AGPL changes nothing.