4 ms·
I would. I already take one, caffeine. As long as there are no harmful effects and no-one is forced to use anything I have nothing against it.
by sharpneli 13y ago
I would. I already take one, caffeine.
As long as there are no harmful effects and no-one is forced to use anything I have nothing against it.
- zyxley 13y agoThis is exactly what I thought. The question isn't really "are smart drugs ethical to use" (nobody objects to worldwide mass consumption of caffeine), it's "are the side effects ones that won't negatively impact society too much".
- Igglyboo 13y agoYep, if we ban these drugs because it's "not fair" we are limiting our progress as a society, unless they pose a health risk there is nothing wrong with them.
- chao- 13y agoA heavy caffeine user, I also have occasional seasonal allergies (a week per quarter?) and rather than take simple Loratadine, I always prefer the versions that include Pseudoephedrine. It noticeably gives me a bit of extra pep to push on through the sniffles. I'm honest with myself that caffeine is a drug, and that my occasional consumption of Psuedoephedrine is a step away from being low-grade meth user. So would I use something with cognitive benefits at concentrations (or consumption rates) that exhibit no harmful effects? I already do.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- hiphopyo 13y agoCAFFEINATED (PT.1): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OecTZBjFvw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OecTZBjFvw
- kazagistar 13y ago"And being the inquisitive individual that I am, I decided to hit the streets, and talk to a few people about this issue." ... and I stopped watching.