36 ms·
Yes but PHP5 had compelling reasons for upgrading. py3 has a few tweaks and some annoying syntax changes to make things more "pure"
by KaiserPro 13y ago
Yes but PHP5 had compelling reasons for upgrading. py3 has a few tweaks and some annoying syntax changes to make things more "pure"
- TazeTSchnitzel 13y agoSo, counter-intuitively, the bigger leaps are easier to make than the small ones!
- mimighost 13y agoSmall ones as Py3, doesn't deserve a major version boost. It simply doesn't have that much to offer.
- dragonwriter 13y ago> py3 has a few tweaks and some annoying syntax changes to make things more "pure" That may have been true of Python 3.0 vs. 2.x, but Python 3 has moved forward quite a bit since 3.0.
- berkut 13y agoI think the point was there was no "OMG we need that, let's upgrade" feature for most people (unicode maybe). e.g.: * Performance * Getting rid of the GIL * Improve multithreading (somewhat related to above) - multiprocess is still very bad performance-wise A fair number of the things in 3.x could have been added to the 2.x series...