7 ms·

I'm not sure I understand the use case. You're offering file hosting on a $5 DO box (which may get upgraded). That would probably be too unreliable for most pro

I'm not sure I understand the use case. You're offering file hosting on a $5 DO box (which may get upgraded). That would probably be too unreliable for most professional cases, and also it's not a CDN. However, AWS and others offer real CDNs, and at an extremely low cost. Why wouldn't I just use CloudFront if I wanted to host a file that isn't on any CDN? No disrespect intended - I may have misunderstood the purpose.

jgillich 12y ago
It's for use cases where performance and reliability don't matter, like quick demos. The reason for using it and not CloudFront could be that you don't need an account and it's free. It's also faster and easier to use than any alternative I know (like uploading to your own server).