5 ms·
Indeed. They could clarify rather easily. Not using OpenSSL doesn't imply that they are secure, nor does it explain what they are using for the non-technical at
by mercurialshark 13y ago
Indeed. They could clarify rather easily. Not using OpenSSL doesn't imply that they are secure, nor does it explain what they are using for the non-technical attorneys on the site...
- ntakasaki 13y ago>Not using OpenSSL doesn't imply that they are secure Uhh, it does mean that they are secure from the HeartBleed bug. I think you're confused, OpenSSL is a piece of software, SSL is a protocol with multiple implementations. So it's possible to use SSL without using OpenSSL, hence the title of this post is completely wrong.
- mercurialshark 13y agoI understand your point regarding HeartBleed, the title and SSL. However, does that make it acceptable to not use some form of SSL on the non-authentication portion of the site? And are you saying they do?
- wglb 13y agoThat is a different question. The title as you edited it is Illinois Gov't: Don't Worry, We Never Used SSL To Begin With which is very different (and wrong), from Illinois Gov't: Don't Worry, We Never Used OpenSSL To Begin With.
- wglb 13y agoOk, so the non-technical attorneys on the site are going to know what SChannel is? I think not. I think their statement is fine.