3 ms·
> I don't have to assume. In this case I can sample. Now, my sample size isn't very large, in fact it's just one person... me. Ah, yes. Very cute. Doesn't mak
by Dewie 13y ago
> I don't have to assume.
In this case I can sample. Now, my sample size isn't very large, in fact it's just one person... me.
Ah, yes. Very cute. Doesn't make a lick of sense. But cute.
> But don't you think you are taking a comment made largely in jest just a bit too seriously?
It's funny how, when something does not hold up to scrutiny, it was all just a joke all along. Then the person that performed the scrutiny was just an uptight person that couldn't take a joke. Yes. Very convenient.
- jqm 13y agoDo you really think I claim to know how much space drop box freed up or that I propose in reality the reason they hired Rice is to free that space up? You seem to want to argue so let me indulge you.... I postulate geeks are more likely to use Dropbox's free service than non-geeks. Why? 1) They are better informed of alternative options and thus less likely to pay as they can spread their files out over multiple free services. 2) They have less trouble implanting multiple file storage options. Non-geeks are more likely to be intimidated by this and thus pay for the "name brand" and "what they know" option. 3) Geeks are known to be cheap. (ok... say "Cute" again). 4) I can keep going if you want. I think all this pretty clearly indicates my original point was valid. And this ridiculous thread indicates someone needs to spend less time on the computer and stop picking pepper out of flypoop. As for hiring Rice... ya, that seems like a bad idea on Dropbox's part.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- jqm 13y agoA downvote Dewie? Really? That's your "scrutiny"?