3 ms·
He was incarcerated because a Grand Jury thought there was enough evidence to charge him.
by eli 13y ago
He was incarcerated because a Grand Jury thought there was enough evidence to charge him.
- anseljh 13y ago...and because another jury convicted him.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- rhizome 13y agoMaybe the prosecutors were just seeing what they could get away with. Hey, it beats working for a living.
- tptacek 13y agoIn other words, he exceeded the "ham sandwich" threshold.
- DominoTree 13y agoAs someone who was questioned by the AUSA and FBI in front of that federal grand jury, from the onset of things, the prosecution wasn't interested in finding justice, only in twisting everyone's words as much as necessary to secure an indictment, and later, a conviction.