3 ms·

- War propaganda; pornography and antisocial behavior propaganda - Free speech abuse: Extremism - Free speech abuse: Drug production and acquisition informat

- War propaganda; pornography and antisocial behavior propaganda - Free speech abuse: Extremism - Free speech abuse: Drug production and acquisition information - Free speech abuse: Secret information disclosure - Free speech abuse: Latent influence (e.g. hipnosis) - Anything related to extremism - Malicious programs - Information which is a crime by itself (slander, humiliation, call for terrorism, offer for a drug use, etc.) - Improper advertisement (alcohol and tobacco ads) - Secret inforation

itsuart 12y ago
It's worth to note, that they can and actually do block addresses without court order.
exo762 12y ago
And in practice anything they want. Example: navalny.livejournal.com is not available in Russia for some time. Not chosen articles, whole blog.
- Elhana 12y ago
  For a good reason. If Snowden published US secrets soemwhere, how fast do you think it will be taken down by cloudflare. wikileaks never had a problem with hosting either it seems, right?
  - jessaustin 12y ago
    Perhaps you've missed it, but numerous media outlets have published US secrets collected by Snowden. Where are the takedowns you expect against NYT, Washington Post, Guardian, NBC News, etc.?
    - memracom 12y ago
      All these media outlets make a point of saying that they have carefully redacted anything that may put people's lives in danger. I imagine that any site which published it raw would be taken down even in USA.
    - Elhana 12y ago
      Remind me, those photos of Guardian destroying Snowden files all over the news sites are clearly because Russians forced them to? Or was it UK government?
      - bmm6o 12y ago
        That was a quick moving of the goalposts.
  - exo762 12y ago
    Navalny is a political opponent of Putin. He has nothing in common with whole whistle-blowing thing. Blocking his blog is like banning Fox from broadcasting.
mtrimpe 12y ago
> Information which is a crime by itself. Which includes gay propaganda, i.e. anything that mentions homosexuality in a positive or accepting context.
anonbanker 12y ago
Anyone want to start a pool on when "Free Speech Abuse" becomes a thing in the US?

itsuart 12y ago

It's worth to note, that they can and actually do block addresses without court order.

exo762 12y ago

And in practice anything they want. Example: navalny.livejournal.com is not available in Russia for some time. Not chosen articles, whole blog.

Elhana 12y ago
For a good reason. If Snowden published US secrets soemwhere, how fast do you think it will be taken down by cloudflare. wikileaks never had a problem with hosting either it seems, right?
- jessaustin 12y ago
  Perhaps you've missed it, but numerous media outlets have published US secrets collected by Snowden. Where are the takedowns you expect against NYT, Washington Post, Guardian, NBC News, etc.?
  - memracom 12y ago
    All these media outlets make a point of saying that they have carefully redacted anything that may put people's lives in danger. I imagine that any site which published it raw would be taken down even in USA.
  - Elhana 12y ago
    Remind me, those photos of Guardian destroying Snowden files all over the news sites are clearly because Russians forced them to? Or was it UK government?
    - bmm6o 12y ago
      That was a quick moving of the goalposts.
- exo762 12y ago
  Navalny is a political opponent of Putin. He has nothing in common with whole whistle-blowing thing. Blocking his blog is like banning Fox from broadcasting.

mtrimpe 12y ago

> Information which is a crime by itself. Which includes gay propaganda, i.e. anything that mentions homosexuality in a positive or accepting context.

anonbanker 12y ago

Anyone want to start a pool on when "Free Speech Abuse" becomes a thing in the US?