3 ms·
Well, I'm not a fan of the "use folds over time" concept either. FRP is too complex, but there's some great ideas there. Would you say Aurora and these other l
by AlexanderDhoore 13y ago
Well, I'm not a fan of the "use folds over time" concept either. FRP is too complex, but there's some great ideas there.
Would you say Aurora and these other languages are "reactive"? Or do you have a better term for it?
BTW: I'm reading "Toward a better programming" right now :)
- jamii 13y agoOur current design takes a lot of ideas from Functional Relational Programming (http://shaffner.us/cs/papers/tarpit.pdf http://shaffner.us/cs/papers/tarpit.pdf) and Bloom (http://bloom-lang.net/ http://bloom-lang.net/) as well as building on the ideas from Light Table.