It normally would. These sorts of things are normally declaring that such things in contracts are against the public interest, like restrictive covenants in re

It normally would. These sorts of things are normally declaring that such things in contracts are against the public interest, like restrictive covenants in real estate deeds to not sell your land to a black. Those were all made null and void back in 1948 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer), and modern efforts to blacken, so to speak, the reputations of people who since then bought such property are mendacious. But who knows what might emerge from the legislative sausage grinder of the rather corrupt Massachusetts General Court?