3 ms·

The magnitude is absolutely irrelevant. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, and the core issue here is whether or not people have the right to boycott a product over the b

by steven2012 13y ago

The magnitude is absolutely irrelevant. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, and the core issue here is whether or not people have the right to boycott a product over the beliefs or actions of the people who are associated with the product. If I believe that cars are causing global warming, I have the right to boycott the uses of cars and to publicize it. If I believe that eating meat is wrong, I have the right to boycott meat and to publicize it. If the CEO of a company supports a campaign that I believe infringes on human rights, I have the right to boycott that product and to publicize it. If the company of a product I use adds a person who was involved with what I believe was an unjust war that killed hundreds of thousands of people, the I have the right to boycott them and to publicize it.

vacri 13y ago
Eich's issue was irrelevant to the Mozilla product line Rice's issue (about data, not the others) is directly related to the core of Dropbox's product.
- steven2012 13y ago
  Eich is the direct CEO of Mozilla. Rice is not a direct member of the management team of Dropbox, and her past experience is not related at all to Dropbox's product.
  - Diamons 13y ago
    TIL two things: 1. Everyone gets a clean slate the moment they change jobs and 2. Supporting your beliefs with a $1000 donation is the equivalent of going to war, supporting torture, and illegal wiretapping. Get real.
  - vacri 13y ago
    Rice is a director. Sure, it's not a CxO, but directors wield significant influence over the path of a company. It's why they're called directors. As a director, she can use her influence to open channels for external surveillance (of course, using nicer terms than that). I don't mean "open a port on the firewall", I mean saying "hey, it's okay if org Foo gets this kind of data". This is the kind of strategic stuff that directors do. It doesn't matter how solid your sysadmins are if your directors hand over the keys to the castle. And I guess we'll just have to disagree that her past experience has nothing to do with maintaining private data security.

vacri 13y ago

Eich's issue was irrelevant to the Mozilla product line Rice's issue (about data, not the others) is directly related to the core of Dropbox's product.

steven2012 13y ago
Eich is the direct CEO of Mozilla. Rice is not a direct member of the management team of Dropbox, and her past experience is not related at all to Dropbox's product.
- Diamons 13y ago
  TIL two things: 1. Everyone gets a clean slate the moment they change jobs and 2. Supporting your beliefs with a $1000 donation is the equivalent of going to war, supporting torture, and illegal wiretapping. Get real.
- vacri 13y ago
  Rice is a director. Sure, it's not a CxO, but directors wield significant influence over the path of a company. It's why they're called directors. As a director, she can use her influence to open channels for external surveillance (of course, using nicer terms than that). I don't mean "open a port on the firewall", I mean saying "hey, it's okay if org Foo gets this kind of data". This is the kind of strategic stuff that directors do. It doesn't matter how solid your sysadmins are if your directors hand over the keys to the castle. And I guess we'll just have to disagree that her past experience has nothing to do with maintaining private data security.