3 ms·

Thank you. You rightfully point out that her past actions remain relevant today, and that attempting to dismiss them by labeling them as "merely political viewp

Thank you. You rightfully point out that her past actions remain relevant today, and that attempting to dismiss them by labeling them as "merely political viewpoints" does a great disservice to everybody. This woman is directly and indirectly responsible for destroying hundreds of thousands of lives. That should somehow reflect on her resumé, shouldn't it? Now she's being placed in charge of people's personal data. That's not just bad politics, it's bad ethics, and it's bad business.

eli 13y ago
Shouldn't crimes be tried in courts and not online petitions? Does a majority of users get to decide if you've done something wrong enough to disqualify you from a board? A vocal minority?
- dragonwriter 13y ago
  > Shouldn't crimes be tried in courts and not online petitions? Criminal punishments are imposed by courts. Things that may arguably be crimes can also have non-criminal consequences. > Does a majority of users get to decide if you've done something wrong enough to disqualify you from a board? No, usually that's the existing board that has that authority. Users, individually, get to decide if the company has done something (including, inter alia, appointing you to the board) that makes them unwilling to do business with the company.
- pessimizer 13y ago
  >Shouldn't crimes be tried in courts and not online petitions? https://duckduckgo.com/?q="forward%2C+not+backward"+obama https://duckduckgo.com/?q="forward%2C+not+backward"+obama