3 ms·
I don't disagree on these points. But the reality is you are talking every person who has worked for either administration in the post 9/11 era is on this gig.
by 001sky 13y ago
I don't disagree on these points. But the reality is you are talking every person who has worked for either administration in the post 9/11 era is on this gig. We still have guantanomo bay...etc. None of these people in washington are changing anything. The snowden leaks are from 2008-2009 era. That stuf is 6+yrs old. People thought that was tin foil. For 6 years...
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- 001sky 13y agoYes. Look at stuxnet 0.5 (year: 2005-07) http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/feb/26/symantec-us-computer-virus-iran-nuclear http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/feb/26/symantec-u... And stuxnet 1.0 (2009-2010) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/security/the-real-story-of-stuxnet http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/security/the-real-story-of-... This kind of stuff takes years and has a life of its own. Crossing administrations, party lines, and cabinet members. The nexus of the Pentagon, CIA, and State departments...has a lot of moving parts...and they can't fire all the career professionals after every election.