2 ms·
Almost like selling your soul to proprietary software for critical infrastructure bites you in the butt in the long run. I've never liked Sublime Text because
by zanny 13y ago
Almost like selling your soul to proprietary software for critical infrastructure bites you in the butt in the long run.
I've never liked Sublime Text because it took the wind out of FOSS editors like Kate, Geany, etc and stole all kinds of valuable project contributions and userbase.
- coldtea 13y ago>Almost like selling your soul to proprietary software for critical infrastructure bites you in the butt in the long run Don't know, half of the work works with proprietary software for very critical stuff (from banking to government) and I haven't seen it "biting them in the butt". >I've never liked Sublime Text because it took the wind out of FOSS editors like Kate, Geany, etc and stole all kinds of valuable project contributions and userbase. I think you're thinking with an OSS bias (ideology, more like it), instead of pragmatically based on real life facts. ST is huge on Mac and Windows. What few users it "stole" from Kate et al is negligible, much less of stealing "project contributions" from them. And I speak as someone who has used Kate and other FOSS editors since 2000 or so. Those editors cannot hold a candle to ST in aspects of general speed and overall flexibility and architecture.