3 ms·
I was curious about that. Is multiplying a string by a boolean idiomatic Python? I don't write nearly enough Python to know, but it strikes me that this might b
by icambron 13y ago
I was curious about that. Is multiplying a string by a boolean idiomatic Python? I don't write nearly enough Python to know, but it strikes me that this might be more like writing French using lots of obscure words.
- softbuilder 13y agoThis starts to get into "what is idiomatic python?" which changes as the language evolves. For example, before Python had an official ternary form, this was a common idiom: account.status = ["paid", "unpaid"][amount_due > 0] This does the same thing as the FizzBuzz example, coercing a bool to int. Here the int is used as an index into the list of the two strings. Personally, I found this handy and liked it a lot. Others didn't and now there is this, which isn't bad: account.status = "unpaid" if amount_due > 0 else "paid" Maybe it's less like using obscure French and more like speaking in a slightly different dialect, or in a different region with different cultural references.
- yen223 13y agoMultiplying a string by an integer is fine. Treating a boolean as an integer is iffy Multiplying a string by a boolean frankly should be a no-no.