3 ms·
I assumed that you quoted a point from the article: Anecdotal experience isn't proof of statistical relatedness. Edit: And about the GP's claim that the author
by berntb 17y ago
I assumed that you quoted a point from the article: Anecdotal experience isn't proof of statistical relatedness.
Edit: And about the GP's claim that the author's being incompetent and writing unfounded advice. Check their jobs at the end of the article. (They might be incompetent and/or wrong, but they will certainly have lots of relevant data in published papers!)
- ryanwaggoner 17y agoI never said anything about them being incompetent. And publishing data in other unrelated (and unreferenced) publications doesn't make an argument unfounded. They didn't support this claim in this article, either directly or indirectly by clearly linking to relevant studies or research.
- berntb 17y agoI took the term "hollow and completely unfounded advice" as "incompetent", since TFA was written by absurdly competent academics -- in their area. I'm sorry if it upsets you that they didn't give enough references for your taste, to evaluate your anecdotal experiences.