4 ms·

The problem is that I assume there are ruby users out there who think this is a good idea, even though I support that claim with the evidence of "disable whiny

• _pius 17y ago
  The problem is that I assume there are ruby users out there who think this is a good idea, even though I support that claim with the evidence of "disable whiny nils" in Rails? The problem's actually more subtle than that. The implication of what you said is that this is a problem with the Ruby community more so than some other communities. You provided no evidence for that claim at all. The disable whiny nils thing, by the way, doesn't do what you think it does. I'm not "randomly" bashing the ruby community. Sure you are. You're taking one library that happened to be written in Ruby and using it as an excuse to generally bash Rubyists. This is a clever hack, but an extremely bad idea to use in production, and it comes fully packaged as a ruby gem that is ready to be deployed with "gem install". This library is literally a joke. Although maybe not. I think Aaron is also a big fan of using Enterprise Ruby in production, which is why he released this: http://github.com/tenderlove/enterprise/tree/master http://github.com/tenderlove/enterprise/tree/master