Van Vleck Turner & Zaller LLP specializes in all aspects of California labor and employment law. It would be surpising for a law firm to publish something blat

Van Vleck Turner & Zaller LLP specializes in all aspects of California labor and employment law. It would be surpising for a law firm to publish something blatantly obtuse on the subject. More likely, the departure was negotiated with a non-disparagement clause and a payout. A legal action by the disgruntled employee would be terminal for mozilla's mission and brand. The could not risk a trial--it would be worse publicity--so they would settle. But this should have been anticipated and already settled, however. This is why HR people are employed and why executive failures are typically quiet. On the merits, there is public evidence that The Mozilla Foundation chief executive was publicly hostile to the departed executive of MoCo.Due to the corporate structure of mozilla, the Foundation executive can be hostile to MoCo ceo without being in a position of legal unsubordination.[+] Which basically render's your point moot. _________ [+] The foundation is the 100% owner (and thus in a Parent-child relation) of MoCo.