4 ms·
Exactly the first thing I thought. There are plenty of side-channels in cryptographic code that require access to somewhat low-level hardware to fix (e.g. the a
by tga_d 13y ago
Exactly the first thing I thought. There are plenty of side-channels in cryptographic code that require access to somewhat low-level hardware to fix (e.g. the acoustic attack on GPG that got plenty of press), and I don't see how you can address those without e.g. inline C or something else that negates the advantages of using Haskell.
- chrisdone 13y agoFWIW inline C doesn't negate the advantages of using Haskell. It's inline.