3 ms·

Every "automation" - here IT wise I assume would be vulnerable to hackers, scam (who is maintaining this system, whats his role, who controls maintenance etc?)

• iLoch 13y ago
  To a certain degree I agree with you (especially maintenance, etc.) However, we do already partially rely on systems which are similarly vulnerable to hackers. Maybe this statement is naive, but I don't think it's impossible to design a system that is impossible to hack (given enough resources) or at least one that would require so many resource that it wouldn't be feasible to accomplish. The other part of that would be internal tampering, perhaps solved with a publicly viewable log of every action taken within the system? (Yes we may still have problems with tampering, but that's not any different than our current system.) Jobs that require humans can definitely still be part of the government by operating as a manual module that has computer based I/O (think MTurk with government workers), but decision making would be left up to the people and that's what would determine what tasks should be accomplished.