I didn't mean to imply collusion as I have no evidence of that. (As an aside, just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's not occuring.) Not sure if my terms ar

I didn't mean to imply collusion as I have no evidence of that. (As an aside, just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's not occuring.) Not sure if my terms are the correct here, but in my mind I was thinking collective != collaborative - in that it's possible to act collectively by exchanging public market information without crossing the line of colluding.