4 ms·
This announcement proves two points: 1. Moving forward, MPG is not going to be a good measure of efficiency or operating cost. 2. GM is run by salespeople, no
by ccc3 17y ago
This announcement proves two points:
1. Moving forward, MPG is not going to be a good measure of efficiency or operating cost.
2. GM is run by salespeople, not engineers.
- krschultz 17y agoIt begs the question, what is the proper measure? MP$, MPKWH? MP$ is what we really care about but it has to be adjusted for price fluctuations of power and gasoline, pretty impractical. Maybe list MPG City, MPG Highway, MPKWH Battery on the sticker.
- vaporstun 17y agoMPJ - Miles per Joule As we move toward alternative fuels, we need a fuel-independent metric.
- ccc3 17y agoAgreed. It'll have to be a measure of energy consumption per mile. Consumers will also have to develop an understanding of the relative cost of different energy sources. Maybe we rate cars in Miles/Joule and rate energy sources in Joules/$. Makes the math pretty simple.
- sp332 17y agoYou might need to add some cargo/people capacity in there. A tiny electric car will have a hard time beating a diesel MAC truck for efficiency when it's hauling a few tons :)
- ynniv 17y agoJust as a Vespa would have poor gas mileage carrying heavy truck cargo - this has nothing to do with the energy source.
- sp332 17y agoI thought that was the idea - removing different energy sources from the picture and looking at which vehicles are more efficient.
- ynniv 17y agoThere is no intuitive way to convey what you are proposing. If you tried to move 4 tons of cargo, a big rig would use less energy than a Civic. If you are trying to get yourself across town, a Civic will use less energy than a big rig. It would be complicated and expensive to calculate the full spectrum of efficiencies for a vehicle under different cargo loads. Personally, I would use the data, but I suspect the average person would find multiple efficiency graphs to be overwhelming.
- krschultz 17y agoBut 1 Joule of one energy does not cost the same as 1 Joule of another, which is why MPG gasoline and MPG diesel are not directly comparable
- biohacker42 17y agoGPM
- ynniv 17y agoWatt-hours per mile is common, and easy enough for a reasonable consumer to calculate the expense of given the cost of a kWh in their neighborhood. EPA MPG estimates for electric vehicles are unfortunately purposely distorted for the purposes of giving electric vehicles higher MPG [ http://www.sae.org/mags/AEI/6559 http://www.sae.org/mags/AEI/6559 ]. For instance, a gallon of gasoline contains about 33 kWh of energy, but an normal car wastes about 2/3 of this, netting only 11 kWh per gallon. Logically, an electric car should arrive at an MPG by calculating the number of miles that it would travel on this same amount of energy. Instead, the EPA has told all-electric companies that they can do this computation using 82 kWh (almost 7.5 times more than the logical value), giving all-electric cars a huge benefit (Nissan's upcoming electric has claimed 367 MPG). Plug-in electric cars use a different value, which is somewhere between the two, giving Chevy some magic number in between. Just to confuse matters, the EPA sticker on the electric Mini quotes kWh/100 mi, giving it "33" city and "36" highway, numbers that resemble current gasoline car mileages. (more info: http://www.hybridcars.com/fuel-economy-numbers/confusion-over-mpg-ratings-electric-cars-25946.html http://www.hybridcars.com/fuel-economy-numbers/confusion-ove...) [EDIT: Also, it has been said that the gasoline engine in the Volt will provide around 50 MPG. Whenever you travel farther than 40 miles (assuming a full battery), this car is no more gasoline efficient than the Prius.]
- buofbouy 17y agoAnd that plugins are going to be designed around the specifics of the EPA test. If the next plugin only needs the engine for half the time on this same route will that count as 500mpg?