4 ms·
Emphatically agreed. Like many a political scandal, this became a full-blown crisis not because of the original issue but because of how poorly Eich managed it
by bcantrill 13y ago
Emphatically agreed. Like many a political scandal, this became a full-blown crisis not because of the original issue but because of how poorly Eich managed it. If Eich had -- like countless other public figures -- expressed a change in point of view on this issue, this would have blown over. As it stood, his recalcitrant stand on the issue was (and is) indefensible, the unwillingness to so much as discuss it was arrogant and the non-apology was patronizing -- but the inability to see how and why he was failing spoke to a much deeper incompetence. Eich is clearly not the stuff that CEOs are made of, and Mozilla as an organization is probably (ultimately) lucky to have figured that out so quickly.
- interstitial 13y agoI don't think you know what the word indefensible means. Clearly it is defensible to millions and millions of peopel. But you are too pompous and self-righteous to recognize the cowardice of your own position. Indeed, a hackernews is full of convenient, self-serving, image-crafted self-righteousness.