4 ms·
No. When you publicly take an abhorrent position, it is normally necessary to specifically repudiate that position to remove the doubt in people's minds. Genera
by jamesaguilar 13y ago
No. When you publicly take an abhorrent position, it is normally necessary to specifically repudiate that position to remove the doubt in people's minds. Generalities will not cut it.
- Natsu 13y ago> When you publicly take an abhorrent position Donating to a cause and having the people against it sue to find out the backers (while giving assurances that no retribution is planned) is a very strange case to apply the word "publicly" to.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoI don't understand why you chose to nitpick that word. Do you not believe that his stance is publicly known? That is all that matters for the rest of what I said. He would have to repudiate it specifically. His general statements are insufficient.
- Natsu 13y agoBecause this appears to have been planned well in advance. That lends support to the idea that no one would have believed him no matter what he had said.
- jamesaguilar 13y agoWhat does? The boycott? You must be joking.