7 ms·
My point isn't that it is moonshot or bust - but that you may (like a friend of mine) find yourself having raised $5m to create a business that is very nice, bu
by inthewoods 13y ago
My point isn't that it is moonshot or bust - but that you may (like a friend of mine) find yourself having raised $5m to create a business that is very nice, but won't scale to the level the VCs expect or want. And the exit might be good or might be bad depending on market timing. But the contrast here is that he'll often talk about how much happier he'd be if he'd just bootstrapped the company. Now you can make the argument that he may not have been able to - but the point remains - he's got a good, non-scalable business where his investors are expecting him to magically solve for scalability. Not a great place to be.
Your numbers are a bit off compared with what I'm thinking as well - "say you have a $10m business" - that misses the point - he starts the business and there is little to no revenue. He raises a bunch of money but doesn't know if he can create a business that can get bought for $20m. He takes the money and then discovers he has a nice $2m business - but he can't scale it anymore. Because he doesn't have a great growth plan, no one is buying him out for 10x revenue. Thus he's a bit stuck.
- brc 13y agoI think this happens a lot more than people realize. At that point, it's like being stuck in a bad marriage with lots of kids. No easy options. The worst part about it - if the company exits at a low value, it's likely to be classed as a 'failure' - even if it is profitable and has happy customers. It's impossible to know in advance which companies will only scale to a certain size - hence the problem. I guess the solution is to only take on money when you can show that you have a scalable business that just needs more investment to fly higher.