4 ms·
Maybe it's because you don't typically see an "app" that is just completely unusable on your device. When the vast majority of simple websites (not even applic
by just2n 13y ago
Maybe it's because you don't typically see an "app" that is just completely unusable on your device.
When the vast majority of simple websites (not even applications) have terrible experiences on mobile web browsers, is it really any surprise that users prefer using an app that at least puts effort into being usable?
HN and at least 80% of the linked articles I read on my commute have terrible mobile interfaces.
I really don't see the "performance" argument. It's unlikely anything you build natively is going to compete with a browser's raw HTML/CSS performance. That's something they do incredibly well. And really, that's all a static blog needs to be. I don't need your comments. I don't need your ads. I don't need your HTTPS. I don't need your massively broken up application that requires a GET for every asset on the page (and the 20+ JS files you've decided not to package together, none of which is needed). I don't need your parallax effects, your hover/click listeners, your scroll events, your damn lightboxes, or your image rotators.
At the end of the day, I don't use the mobile web very much. It's not because mobile web sucks. It's because nearly everything on the mobile web sucks.
- methodover 13y agoMore than anything else, I wish simple web pages were vogue. Complex web pages are a pain to maintain. They're a huge liability, really. And there's really no need for them to be so complex. The only reason I can see is people who have little understanding of how web pages are constructed are usually the ones in charge of designing them. ... Maybe I should transition over to web design.