2 ms·
Discerning any scientific results from this article was impossible when filtered by all non-scientists. I'm happy to see lay/ethical/moral discussions of resear
by logn 13y ago
Discerning any scientific results from this article was impossible when filtered by all non-scientists. I'm happy to see lay/ethical/moral discussions of research but I'd like to at least clearly see the science first. The information presented in this article wasn't different than what any average group of people could have come up with over lunch, but it's written with this authoritative and dramatic tone like we're all learning something.
They bring up some startling 'scientific facts', that the internet may be permanently changing our brains and destroying reading ability. There's some confused explanations of evolution (or lack thereof) thrown in. Can we all try to understand this first before we zip to a pleasant concluding paragraph from a mother raising kids?