The article is just a true gem on how not to do damage control. > The drone is owned by local videographer Warren Abrams who said video footage clearly showed

The article is just a true gem on how not to do damage control. > The drone is owned by local videographer Warren Abrams who said video footage clearly showed the drone drop just behind the woman. > He said the nature of her injuries suggested the drone missed her. > Mr Abrams said an initial investigation had indicted that someone nearby "channel hopped" the device, taking control away from the operator. Not first and foremost getting an apology across, acting defensively and then attempting to pass blame onto a mystical unverifiable third party. Then comes the prestige: > The videographer added that there had been a similar incident when the drone was flown earlier in the day. And he still went ahead with flight?