4 ms·
I also believe in the technology and the general architecture you're espousing. I found the content on http://www.staticapps.org http://www.staticapps.org well
by thruflo 13y ago
I also believe in the technology and the general architecture you're espousing. I found the content on http://www.staticapps.org http://www.staticapps.org well written and constructive and the links to http://www.divshot.com http://www.divshot.com are unobtrusive.
My reaction to http://www.divshot.com http://www.divshot.com is something else entirely. To solve the "problem" of static file hosting and deployment with a service that is "compatible with Angular and Firebase" and supports "pushState with custom routes" is clearly disingenuous.
Not that there's anything wrong with effective marketing. If your target audience is people who don't know what the words mean, then knock yourself out.
- mbleigh 13y agoWe're trying to market to people who want to use static architecture, regardless of experience. It's a bit of an education issue as people are familiar with e.g. Angular and Ember but don't necessarily know what it means to deploy them as a static app. Can you tell me what you find disingenuous about the claims? What would appeal to you when describing a static web hosting service?