8 ms·
Anti-Tech Protesters Are Telling Kevin Rose’s Neighbors That He’s A “Parasite”
- ForHackernews 13y agoIsn't Kevin Rose that guy who killed Digg?
- unphasable 13y agoI think he's the guy who started it in the 1st place. Also brought the "like" function to the masses. Now he works mainly in VC.
- sharth 13y agoHe's probably most well known as one of the founders of Digg.
- jonny_eh 13y agoSo making jobs makes you a parasite?
- baddox 13y agoThe movement seems to have been appropriated or at inspired by people claiming to be anti-capitalism anarchists. In that idealogy, the very existence of jobs is considered parasitic. Wage labor, which they call "wage slavery," is seen as inherently exploitative. They aren't just against high paid jobs in the technology sector, they're against the very idea of division of labor and capitalism.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- stefan_kendall3 13y agoInspired enough to protest individuals, but not enough to learn the skills needed to be paid the 4x wages they cite the parasites move to SF for. Imagine if all that rage time was spent learning rails and mobile development.
- akira2501 13y agoWell.. if it hadn't been for the cock-sucking bubble in the 90s, they might be alright today.
- primitivesuave 13y agoGrowing up in the 90's, we sure did love to get our cock sucked. Our generation has grown up though, now all we want is for our kids to be watched and our floors to be mopped.
- spacemanmatt 13y agoTBF we also want our cabs driven.
- ajkjk 13y agoThis pains me to read. Are you really so convinced that the techie crowd got ahead from its own savvy and motivation and everyone else is too lazy to do so? There's nothing like writing off huge swathes of people based on an utterly distorted view of reality.
- LukeB_UK 13y agoIsn't this basically harassment?
- dobbsbob 13y agoThis is what scientologists do, harass your neighbours with flyers carefully worded as to avoid libel and post them all over the neighborhood. Pretty weak resorting to Scilon tactics
- Hemospectrum 13y agoSuch methods are despicable in and of themselves, not for being associated with a particular faction. If that was how it worked, Germany would have outlawed vegetarian diets, art school, mustaches, and pants.
- ColinWright 13y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7542197 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7542197
- quaunaut 13y agoLets see, it's an article about how tech workers are being targeted because of high earning potential by anarchist service workers, who in the past have harassed other employees of Google and anyone else who is part of the SF tech/startup scene. Which in turn, becomes a place to discuss whether their complaints are valid, and either way, what courses of action might be taken.
- ColinWright 13y agoYes, it's clearly of great interest to people here on HN, and people who are part of the SF tech/startup scene.
- 001sky 13y agoIts fair that HN readers in far flung locales might not relate to this.
- morgante 13y agoOriginally, I was optimistic about the movement. The rent in SF is indeed too damn high. Sadly it's completely radicalized into an organization which harasses individuals for the crime of spreading capital and demands that Google fund anarchist communes. So much for anything positive (ex. better zoning) coming of it.
- noobermin 13y agoThese guys are assholes, but the issue remains a huge problem. I just hope people can see through the idiots to see that the issue that they are complaining about is real.
- dragontamer 13y agoMore or less, the same thing happened with Occupy. Its more that SF is a major hub of rebellious anarchists who are utterly inept at running political campaigns or creating anything useful. Occupy kind-of sorta had meaning, until those west-coast anarchists started storming banks, breaking windows, and turned the whole event into a "F* the Police" festival. That sort of behavior scares away the Teachers Unions, the Police Unions... and the many others (who are part of the 99%), and greatly hampers the movement. Nevertheless, you can be sure that the non-assholes are hoping for a solution.
- morgante 13y agoAgreed, Sadly I think this movement is doomed to go the same way as Occupy. Sometimes I wonder if these kooks are hired by the real plutocrats and parasites (ex. real estate developers) to undermine the movement. Or if it's not just one giant surrealist joke.
- bstrand 13y agoNever underestimate the left's propensity to defeat themselves from the inside out, to choose a personal sense of moral and/or ideological superiority over coalition building and meaningful progress. Especially in the SF Bay area.
- 13y ago
- pbateman 13y agoWe are the ones who serve them coffee, deliver them food, suck their cocks, watch their kids, and mop their floors ... To this end, we now make our first clear demand of Google. We demand that Google give three billion dollars to an anarchist organization of our choosing. On the one hand I feel sorry for Kevin having to deal with these crackpots, on the other hand these crackpots are so bad at PR it's hilarious.
- bilalq 13y agoYeah, I totally lost it at that last line. Still, I don't understand how people with grievances think it's ok to vilify and hurt others. The solution to one's suffering shouldn't be found by spreading the pain. Seeing hateful messages about you spread out to your neighbors must feel like an emotional knife to the heart no matter how famous or successful you are.
- eridius 13y agoThe worst part is they're vilifying people who have no other crime other than being successful. These are people that may very well actually agree with the goals of the protestors (e.g. according to the article Kevin Rose does agree that the rent problem and others need to be solved). Or they would, if the protestors would actually try to talk to these people instead of attacking them.
- stretchwithme 13y agoThey often seem blind, deaf and dumb to facts. Which is probably more the reason for the predicament of some than someone else being successful. On the whole, life is made better when people achieve things. They shouldn't be treated shabbily.
- ajkjk 13y agoOf course, why would they, 'ordinary' (bear with me) people not caught up in the world of PR and media and product promotion, have any talent at PR? I think they're allowed to be mad regardless of their media savvy.
- matthewmacleod 13y agoI'd love to know who's actually putting the effort into this nonsense. While gentrification causes obvious problems, particularly around housing, the rampant doublethinky ignorance of literally pointing out that tech money is providing jobs and investment in the area is a bit hard to swallow… feels like there's something else going on here.
- muyuu 13y agoI don't know, maybe they prefer to live on benefits in a cheaper place? If you live on government support, jobs in your area don't help you and the higher prices worsen your situation.
- dragontamer 13y agoThey want to live in San Francisco. SF has always been a "rebel hub" of freedom and anarchy. Its that rebellious spirit that somewhat made the valley what it is today. Ultimately, they call that place their home and wish to say. Market economics however are forcing them to move. Therefore, conflict exists. Honestly, the solution is to build more Apartment complexes and strike down the zoning laws that prevents the new buildings from going up.
- muyuu 13y agoThat doesn't explain that they resent the creation of service jobs as they seem to do. That would only explain that they resent the creation of highly paid tech jobs and the increased demand for housing.
- raldi 13y agoYou got that right. Everything yellow in this map is zoned 40-X, a.k.a. buildings taller than 4 stories are not welcome: http://i.imgur.com/Tn7CSTX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Tn7CSTX.jpg (You can make maps like this at http://propertymap.sfplanning.org/ http://propertymap.sfplanning.org/)
- deleted 13y ago
- rayiner 13y agoVis-à-vis Wall Street's dalliance with the left coast: this is what you get for dating crazy.
- dkasper 13y agoHere's the source post from the protest organizers http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/04/06/18753651.php http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/04/06/18753651.php
- steele 13y agoHe is alone in his battle with their neighborhood raccoon problem.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- BashiBazouk 13y agoI wonder about these folks. Are they the gays, hippies, yuppies, and beatniks or the children thereof that changed San Francisco to the chagrin of the previous generation?
- dragontamer 13y agoAnd yet, it is the "Rich who wage war on the poor". Granted, this is San Francisco. They've always been a roudy bunch over there. But this kind of behavior negatively looks upon the "99%". (or more specifically, the activists who claim to be the 99%). Gendrification happens all across the country, and the renting-class poor are forced to move out of neighborhoods as they get more expensive. But only in San Francisco does gendrification seem to be so painful...
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- Bluestrike2 13y agoNice to see that crazy hasn't disappeared.
- stretchwithme 13y agoFluctuations in property values, and thus rents, are driven by Federal Reserve policy. These problems are created in Washington and real estate lobbying is more to blame. That lobby has promoted, and our leaders have accepted, the notion that recoveries are led by the housing market. They believe consumption, not production, is the source of prosperity. Its all designed, they say, to help the little people. But its the little people that are abused the most by these policies. Yes, asset prices and thus rents ought to be stable and increase in a predictable way. These rapid rent increases compel people to buy (assuming they can), only to set them up for the next crash in real estate prices. Overall, we don't benefit from these bubbles. Some get lucky for owning when they start and others get unlucky for owning when they collapse. But those charging 6% on every transaction profit more when people buy and sell more. And bubbles are great for causing lots of transactions.
- dragontamer 13y agoWhat the hell does Washington have to do with local zoning laws? San Francisco is a densely populated city with very little land. However, buildings taller than 4-stories are outlawed. If a couple of 20+ floor apartment complexes are built, you can be rest assured that the more typical / mundane housing will become available for the rest of the citizens. SF needs more housing, period. Local laws are what is screwing the pooch on this one.
- stretchwithme 13y agoIts things like QE2 that are creating demand for real estate. The tech boom is driven by venture capital, which is driven by cheap money. And real estate is financed by it as well. Making it easier to build would help too, of course. But building HAS been going on. Isn't Rincon Hill 50 stories tall? Did zoning prevent it?
- cromwellian 13y agoThe techboom was happening long before QE2, QE1, or the 2008 crisis. In case you haven't noticed, Google's been around since 1998, founded near the tail end of the previous tech boom. They didn't suddenly hire all of these Googlers in 2008, Twitter, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, etc have been hiring like crazy for a long time. I dunno, call me crazy, but maybe this time, it's time to let go of the libertarian 'gubmint did it' angle and admit that natural booms exist.
- Bluestrike2 13y agoWhat these people really want is for all of the "other people" to go away. That's the only way you could ever see housing prices in SF go down given the current market circumstances. You have a city that's surrounded by water, a convoluted regulatory environment that actively depresses development activity, and a total unwillingness to build vertically. In the long-term, either the people leave, the water somehow disappears, or you rewrite city codes and start building vertically. Of the three, only the lattermost is even feasible.
- trevyn 13y agoThere was a plan to disappear the water, but don't worry, "we stopped them". http://blog.savesfbay.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Bart-Ad-1_FINAL.jpg http://blog.savesfbay.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Bart-Ad...
- thrillgore 13y agoDo they honestly think idle threats will lead to anything apropos of anything the opposite of nothing?
- spacemanmatt 13y agoWell, is he?
- jiggy2011 13y agoI'm not from SF (or even the US) so I'm not sure I understand this situation. Usually people welcome new business opening in their area so long as it's not something that is polluting, because these businesses can do things like provide lots of jobs to people across the income/skills spectrum and also drive investment in local infrastructure and support local organisations and charities. In these cases the rising house prices can be a good thing because those who get positions at the new companies can buy these houses and price increases protect their investments. Is the difference that tech companies are only providing small numbers of jobs to people with specific skills who are brought in from other areas of the country/the world? Perhaps also tech companies are only interested in doing good on a global scale and not starting in their own back yard?
- OafTobark 13y agoSF is now the most expensive city to live in, in the US base on a few sources. While it's true normally growth and new jobs is seen as a good thing, here, it's specifically the tech sector that is growing with the majority of hires and wage increase focused entirely on developers mostly. Imagine if rent goes up 300% or more in the past few years and you work as a waiter or any other number of non-tech jobs. Increase salaries and demands for hires in the tech sector would have nothing to do with you nor would you probably qualify for a job yet you suffer from all the consequences of the growth and demand happening around you aka your wage is the same but trying to rent a place now costs several thousands of dollars more than it did 5 years ago. That's essentially the problem locals who aren't in the tech field are facing.
- omegaworks 13y ago>yet you suffer from all the consequences of the growth and demand happening around you aka your wage is the same What would a $15-$17 minimum wage SF look like?
- OafTobark 13y agoSF already have the highest minimum wage in the united states. It has it's own minimum wage as a city compare to the state. That said, even if you increase to say $20/he, that roughly translate to about $40k/year. Compare that to where 6-figure salaries are the norm for entry developers (where is was maybe just $60k for fresh grads a few years back) and you can see the growing discrepancy. I understand that developers are viewed as providing greater value this they should be paid more than minimum wage laborers but that doesn't change the situation with housing costs for both buying and selling. In some cases a two bedroom place these days can go average around 3-4k for a decent place in a decent neighborhood.
- sologoub 13y agoThese sentiments aren't new and aren't unique to SF (unfortunately). I haven't seen such blatant assaults on people in LA, but Santa Monica went through a similar transformation where it became super desirable relatively quickly, driving up rents. There is a law here called TORCA (Tenant Ownership Rights Charter Amendment). When I first heard the name, it took me a bit to comprehend it, as in my book "Tenant" and "Ownership" are mutually exclusive and make the term an oxymoron. But when you learn about how powerful the renter's rights lobby is in SM city council, you realize that the joke is on the landlords, at least for the life of the TORCA tenant.
- mikelat 13y agoAre they aware that if the techies leave, the demand for their jobs like making coffee and mopping floors will drastically decrease? These are not very forward thinking people.
- jkelsey 13y agoNot that intimidation or vilification of gentrifiers is acceptable (it's not), but I'm a bit surprised how just how simply that most people here brush off the problems that the so-called 'anti-tech' crowd are complaining about. We consider ourselves such great problem solvers, but I don't see anyone in software solving the housing problem in our major cities. Admittedly, it's a hard fucking problem and some of the people who would dare suggest that it's easily solvable aren't taking any of this seriously. Building codes, while imperfect and prone to abuse by corrupt politicians and business people, do exist for reason (especially in earthquake-prone SF and LA). If it were such a easily problem as some people suggest, it would have been solved and monetized by now. Everybody loves when their community gets all the amenities that pop up when people with more money move in, but then what's the point when you're being forced out a year later when your rent or property taxes explode? That shit sucks. My intention isn't to attack and start a conflict here. I would hope that maybe we could start taking the problem more seriously and maybe start thinking harder about how to actually solve the housing problem. It's a little more complex than just sitting around wishing that our current pay-to-play political system will all of the sudden magically grow a absolutist moral center and fix zoning laws and building codes.
- WWLink 13y agoGuess the nerds aren't allowed to get a break from the bullying as adults either huh.
- mason240 13y agoIt's interesting that this got flagged off the front page. At least I assume it was flagged off, as there are several stories on the front page right now that older and with less votes.
- dengnan 13y agoA little bit off topic, but related to the rents in SF: I've been to San Francisco and the first impression to me is that as a city with large population, why there's so little high-rise buildings? Is there any law which limits the buildings' height?