3 ms·
This piece of writing feels a bit strange to me. Who is the person "saying" this? The post appears to express some amount of disappointment at the departure of
by akanet 13y ago
This piece of writing feels a bit strange to me. Who is the person "saying" this? The post appears to express some amount of disappointment at the departure of Eich, and attempts to put in perspective how the employee base felt about his prop 8 donation.
And yet, I'm not sure what this FAQ is supposed to convey. The writer clearly has knowledge of interactions between Eich and senior execs at Mozilla. Did one of them write this? Did this whole thing go through the PR department?
It appears to answer some obvious questions and leaves other, even more obvious questions unanswered. If Mozilla was not forced out by employee pressure, was it the media circus that did? The post appears to deal with all of the questions except the ones that really matter: Why, really, did Eich quit? Who is on which side of the fence at Mozilla?
- bzbarsky 13y ago> Who is the person "saying" this? This is an official statement from Mozilla-the-organization. So it's not one single person saying it; it was contributed to by multiple people. > And yet, I'm not sure what this FAQ is supposed to convey. Facts. Something that's been missing from the media coverage, because they're a lot less clear than sound bites. > Did one of them write this? I would be shocked if they were not involved. They were probably not the only people involved. > was it the media circus that did? Yes, plus the various private harrassment and threats that triggered. I wish the FAQ were clearer on the matter. > Why, really, did Eich quit? Put yourself in his position. What would you have done and why, and what do you expect the results would have been? > Who is on which side of the fence at Mozilla? On which particular issue?