3 ms·

Sweet story ... and another vote for MikroTik routers for personal use.

• jlgaddis 13y ago
  I'd go along with that, assuming that RouterOS is replaced by OpenWRT or FreeBSD.
  • krick 13y ago
    Do you think configuring OS for your router manually would leave less chance for it to be broken? I suspect I'd leave more holes setting up all the stuff myself, than relying on MikroTik folks knowledge. Besides, are there some step-by-step guides/checklists that would help build secure environment for your router/PC?
    • deleted 13y ago
      [deleted]
    • jlgaddis 13y ago
      I should probably say that I have a dislike of (and am biased against) MikroTik because of their disregard of the GPL. For the price, though, I think the hardware is generally pretty decent. Anyway, I don't feel real confident in the security of the RouterOS software although I don't have any hard or articulable reasons for that. It's just a "gut feeling", I suppose. I do have much more confidence in both OpenWRT and FreeBSD. If you're just using the device as a home router/firewall, you don't really need many (if any) daemons running and exposed so the attack surface is pretty minimalized. My own router at home came with RouterOS on it (although it's not MikroTik hardware) but I replaced it with OpenBSD.
• sirn 13y ago
  I've seen MikroTik router mentioned on HN quite few times, and have been wondering how is it better compared to say, Broadcom-based routers running OpenWRT/Tomato/DD-WRT. Could you clarify why? (I've looked at RB750GL, which looks very interesting considering its price, but still don't know how would compared to my current ASUS RT-N16+Tomato setup.)