3 ms·
Does anyone know if using relaxations to compute interior coordinates is still the state of the art? Once you've done this, do you end up computing a dense MxN
by jwmerrill 13y ago
Does anyone know if using relaxations to compute interior coordinates is still the state of the art?
Once you've done this, do you end up computing a dense MxN matrix-vector product for each component of an internal mesh point displacement, where M is the number of internal mesh vertices, and N is the number of cage vertices?
It seems like you could do much better by exploiting the fact that nearby interior point displacements are similar, using a fast multipole method:
http://math.nyu.edu/faculty/greengar/shortcourse_fmm.pdf http://math.nyu.edu/faculty/greengar/shortcourse_fmm.pdf
If anyone here is an expert, has this idea been tried and discarded for some reason?