3 ms·
Your link contains nothing to refute the fact that gays are more likely to have been abused (which is true), just the idea that abuse is the singular, causal fa
by ebfe 13y ago
Your link contains nothing to refute the fact that gays are more likely to have been abused (which is true), just the idea that abuse is the singular, causal factor of homosexuality (which nobody is suggesting).
- tomelders 13y ago> gays are more likely to have been abused (which is true) It is not true. Where the hell are you getting all this nonsense from?
- ebfe 13y agoHere's a study on the topic. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
- tomelders 13y agoHere's that study being debunked http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/ http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a...