2 ms·
While it would be nice for the kernel to handle any kind of bad behaviour by default, it isn't always realistic. I mean, it would be nice if the kernel by defa
by Rantenki 13y ago
While it would be nice for the kernel to handle any kind of bad behaviour by default, it isn't always realistic.
I mean, it would be nice if the kernel by default could handle a simple forkbomb, but it doesn't without restricting your limits.conf fairly severely. You can blow up the system in a variety of ways that are outside of the kernel's responsibility. It's not up to the kernel devs to hack around your bad behaviour.
- programmer_dude 13y agoPlease see my response to tdsamardzhiev. I have replied to some of your points there. I agree this borders on bad behaviour since the author knows the kernel does not have rate limiting in place. Ideally he should have put in a feature request with the kernel devs and should have self regulated the log traffic using some workaround (like checking for debug.systemd) until the kernel stepped up its game. If I were Linus I would have taken this up as a challenge (as I am sure he will too).