4 ms·
Don't underestimate the power of bundling. Even if content becomes decoupled from the cable companies, bundling is still a powerful way for content companies to
by salmonellaeater 13y ago
Don't underestimate the power of bundling. Even if content becomes decoupled from the cable companies, bundling is still a powerful way for content companies to get a small amount of revenue for content they know you don't care much about.
The way it works is this: consider customer A, who isn't subscribed to any TV service. Customer B is subscribed to HBO only. Which customer is likely to pay more for a subscription to a different channel, say AMC? The content provider wants to charge less to the customer who already has HBO, since they know that customer gets less marginal value for an additional channel and is willing to pay less. The best way to figure out which customers already have HBO is to bundle the services.
This is also why dreams of splitting the 100-channel packages into separate deals for a dollar a channel are so misguided. If you're trying to buy a single channel, the content provider knows you really want that channel, so they'll charge you $40 for it. If you already have 99 channels and you're buying channel 100, they know you don't want it at all and might charge an amortized $0.05.
- eddieroger 13y agoExactly right, and I don't understand how people don't notice this already. Cable packages are deliberate. The crossover between channels is low, but those why watch TNT (for example) help pay for TBS, which they may not watch, and vice versa. Not to mention that the cable provider is subsidizing subscriptions back to the content provider, so while you may only pay $3 to ESPN (which you don't watch, of course), Comcast is also paying for the right to carry it.