2 ms·
If marriage is a venue for biological reproduction, then people shouldn't get the tax breaks and other legal benefits (hospital visitation, etc) until they've d
by bashinator 13y ago
If marriage is a venue for biological reproduction, then people shouldn't get the tax breaks and other legal benefits (hospital visitation, etc) until they've done so. Maybe the marriage certificate should be provisional until the first birth? Also, adoption certainly shouldn't count, since that's something same-sex couples can also do.
- jqm 13y agoOh, I agree 100% on the tax breaks and legal benefits. This is skewed in favor of the "traditional" at the moment and this isn't fair. But, part of societies job is to insure future generations. Bottom line.... gay people can't do this.
- bashinator 13y agoStable high-income gay couples can't give adopted children a far better life opportunity (and hence increased tax income and lower social welfare costs for society at large), than if those children bounced around in foster homes until aging out?