> Which is it? The two (not supporting gay marriage, and supporting equality) are mutually incompatible. He supports equality at a lower resolution (in abstrac

> Which is it? The two (not supporting gay marriage, and supporting equality) are mutually incompatible. He supports equality at a lower resolution (in abstract) than most of us in some areas. We all have moral blind spots. He has his life experience. You can tell that his intent is good by his effort and humility. He also has a reputation of being forthright and not deceptive. > Do you understand why a lot of people have concerns that this might not be true, whether openly, or indirectly through decisions he might have made? That is true. He also recognized this bias and promoted a system of oversight to ensure that the culture is inclusive. Everybody has bias. We need to set up our systems to account for that reality.